PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.65%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-22.29%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-18.11%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.91%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.05%
Similar operating expenses growth to SLDP's 22.17%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
2.73%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.87%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-130.82%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-138.36%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-150.53%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.06%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-122.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-127.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.46%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-103.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-104.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.26%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-12.92%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.