PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
22.39%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
69.72%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
9.26%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.16%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of SLDP's 22.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
26.55%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.46%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.32%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SLDP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.03%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.20%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3554.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.94%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
86.69%
Tax expense change of 86.69% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-45.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.74%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-6.33%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.