PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.32%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.95%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-14.32%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.39%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
55.65%
R&D growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
200.00%
Marketing expense change of 200.00% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.37%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.60%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.17%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-76.91%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.81%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-67.18%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.78%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2563.31%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-74.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
151.05%
Tax expense change of 151.05% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-175.62%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-190.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-200.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.57%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.52%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.