PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
187.83%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
303.53%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
141.82%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-15.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.30%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 22.17%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
148.60%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.05%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
733.71%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
189.66%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1131.48%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
327.86%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-77.19%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1597.50%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
489.77%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
57.33%
Tax expense change of 57.33% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
682.71%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
302.45%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.85%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.97%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.