PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.31%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 7.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
5.54%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-20.84%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.73%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.78%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 22.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.85%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.47%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-44.27%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
24.29%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SLDP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.25%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.04%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2339.83%
Other expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.41%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.23%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.69%
Tax expense change of 68.69% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-11.48%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.30%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.20%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.09%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.