PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 7.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
257.86%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-39.64%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.49%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
46.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SLDP's 100.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-23.05%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
50.46%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.77%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 0.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.83%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense change of 100.00% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
100.00%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.00%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
133.33%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.47%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
3.45%
Diluted share increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.