PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.63%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-72.84%
Cost reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
147.04%
Growth of 147.04% while SLDP shows flat gross profit. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
296.08%
Margin change of 296.08% while SLDP shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.96%
Operating expenses change of 63.96% while SLDP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-41.86%
Total costs reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.23%
D&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.20%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.39%
Margin change of 35.39% while SLDP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-15.19%
Operating income decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
35.98%
Margin change of 35.98% while SLDP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-284.25%
Other expenses reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-35.90%
Pre-tax income decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.77%
Margin change of 2.77% while SLDP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-38.92%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-33.61%
Net income decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.45%
Margin change of 6.45% while SLDP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-28.57%
EPS decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.57%
Diluted EPS decline while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.98%
Share count reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.20%
Diluted share reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.