0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Positive growth while SLDP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
241.14%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
18.63%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-40.69%
Margin decline while SLDP shows 13.60% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.88%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
106.31%
Total costs growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
D&A growth above 1.5x SLDP's 3.41%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
100.00%
EBITDA growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-10.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
76.71%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.64%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
126.40%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 77.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 0.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.00%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while SLDP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.00%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 4.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 2514.50%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
3.20%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 2215.43%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.