PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
110.57%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 2.45%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
402.59%
Cost increase while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-58.43%
Gross profit decline while SLDP shows 42.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-80.26%
Margin decline while SLDP shows 39.44% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.50%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 66.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
128.66%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SLDP's 56.73%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
917.31%
D&A growth above 1.5x SLDP's 16.41%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
205.31%
EBITDA growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.08%
EBITDA margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.64%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-23.24%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.54%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x SLDP's 64.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
100.00%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Similar EPS growth to SLDP's 92.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SLDP's 92.32%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-4.41%
Share count reduction while SLDP shows 3271.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
6.04%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 3339.73%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.