PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.13%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-74.72%
Cost reduction while SLDP shows 17.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
225.85%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
418.31%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while SLDP shows 48.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2218.01%
Operating expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-38.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.61%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-51.79%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.81%
EBITDA margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-24.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.15%
Operating margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-116.03%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-50.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-65.52%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-40.11%
Net income decline while SLDP shows 11.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-50.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.39%
Share count increase while SLDP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.85%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.