PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-37.40%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 8.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-69.63%
Cost reduction while SLDP shows 18.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
129.53%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
266.67%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.82%
G&A growth while SLDP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
104.96%
Marketing expense growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.84%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 4.04%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-42.89%
Total costs reduction while SLDP shows 6.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SLDP shows 140.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-89.14%
D&A reduction while SLDP shows 63.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-59.13%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.83%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 28.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
556.16%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
948.22%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 2.57%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-37.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-41.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.75%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
77.61%
Tax expense growth while SLDP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-88.90%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
306.15%
Share count reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.52%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
9.27%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.