0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17.40%
Positive growth while SLDP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-34.50%
Cost reduction while SLDP shows 508.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
313.44%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
252.15%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-6.68%
G&A reduction while SLDP shows 16.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
62.19%
Marketing expense growth while SLDP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.14%
Operating expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.45%
Total costs reduction while SLDP shows 15.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.19%
D&A reduction while SLDP shows 0.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
129.78%
EBITDA growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1471.67%
EBITDA margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1367.46%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1179.56%
Operating margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-261.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
236.94%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
186.99%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-36.49%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 1806.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2002.95%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1691.20%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.23%
Share count reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.53%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-17.11%
Diluted share reduction while SLDP shows 0.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.