PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-47.69%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 29.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-69.34%
Cost reduction while SLDP shows 4.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.48%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SLDP's 58.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
92.09%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 68.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.16%
G&A change of 41.16% while SLDP maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
103.68%
Marketing expense change of 103.68% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while SLDP shows 4.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
179.46%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 2.47%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-45.77%
Total costs reduction while SLDP shows 2.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-67.74%
D&A reduction while SLDP shows 9.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-49.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.24%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 29.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.14%
Operating income decline while SLDP shows 3.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.85%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 25.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-948.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-53.21%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while SLDP shows 4.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.82%
Tax expense change of 2.82% while SLDP maintains burden. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate strategy.
-64.13%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-31.43%
Net margin decline while SLDP shows 4.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-62.96%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-62.96%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while SLDP shows 0.18% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.