PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
100.00%
Positive growth while SLDP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
232.03%
Cost growth above 1.5x SLDP's 2.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.33%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-44.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.48%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
100.00%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SLDP's 0.41%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
331.75%
D&A growth above 1.5x SLDP's 41.42%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
90.40%
EBITDA growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.84%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
78.01%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
97.28%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SLDP's 3.68%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
100.00%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while SLDP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.00%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.00%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
100.00%
EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
90.00%
Diluted EPS growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.88%
Share count reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.61%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.06%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.