PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-82.06%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 153.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-89.91%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-66.00%
Gross profit decline while SLDP shows 133.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
89.45%
Similar margin change to SLDP's 113.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while SLDP shows 31.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
15.12%
G&A growth while SLDP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-3.19%
Marketing expense reduction while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.54%
Similar operating expenses growth to SLDP's 33.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-71.07%
Total costs reduction while SLDP shows 13.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-40.62%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-115.52%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-187.42%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 59.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-123.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-230.42%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 60.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-97.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-124.75%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-237.93%
Pre-tax margin decline while SLDP shows 56.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-99.13%
Tax expense reduction while SLDP shows 251.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-139.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-317.76%
Net margin decline while SLDP shows 56.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-140.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-142.11%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.85%
Share count reduction below 50% of SLDP's 1.28%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while SLDP shows 1.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.