PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.54%
Positive growth while SLDP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-45.14%
Cost reduction while SLDP shows 28.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
870.69%
Positive growth while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
750.14%
Margin expansion while SLDP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.69%
G&A change of 22.69% while SLDP maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
86.91%
Marketing expense change of 86.91% while SLDP maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
85.43%
Operating expenses growth while SLDP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.99%
Total costs reduction while SLDP shows 0.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-74.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
207.25%
EBITDA growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
187.88%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x SLDP's 14.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
184.02%
Operating income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
170.87%
Operating margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-226.40%
Other expenses reduction while SLDP shows 7.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
164.02%
Pre-tax income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
154.01%
Pre-tax margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
263.07%
Tax expense growth while SLDP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
167.73%
Net income growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
157.14%
Net margin growth while SLDP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
166.67%
EPS change of 166.67% while SLDP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
166.67%
Diluted EPS change of 166.67% while SLDP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
5.78%
Share count reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
4.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.89%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.