PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-41.24%
Revenue decline while SLDP shows 34.89% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-37.57%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-44.89%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while SLDP shows 2.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
30.99%
G&A growth while SLDP reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-21.62%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.65%
Operating expenses reduction while SLDP shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-30.35%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
91.33%
D&A growth while SLDP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-59.47%
EBITDA decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.02%
EBITDA margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.49%
Operating income decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-77.00%
Operating margin decline while SLDP shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
134.95%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-74.45%
Pre-tax income decline while SLDP shows 49.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-56.52%
Pre-tax margin decline while SLDP shows 62.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.31%
Tax expense growth while SLDP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.08%
Net income decline while SLDP shows 41.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.38%
Net margin decline while SLDP shows 56.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-70.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.93%
Share count reduction below 50% of SLDP's 0.85%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-2.64%
Diluted share reduction while SLDP shows 0.85% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.