0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Profitability reveals how effectively the business turns revenues into profits. Higher and improving margins or returns on capital suggest a durable competitive advantage, supporting a stronger intrinsic valuation.
-0.61%
Negative ROE while SLDP stands at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate capital misallocation or uncompetitive positioning.
-0.31%
Negative ROA while SLDP stands at 6.95%. John Neff would check for structural inefficiencies or mispriced assets.
-3.98%
Both companies show negative ROCE. Martin Whitman would investigate if external factors hamper profitability.
3.52%
Positive margin while SLDP is negative. John Neff would see if this confers a decisive advantage.
-9.41%
Both companies are negative at the operating level. Martin Whitman would see if the entire niche faces fundamental challenges.
-1.04%
Negative net margin while SLDP has 4118.50%. Joel Greenblatt would check if uncompetitive pricing or bloated costs cause losses.