PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
These metrics indicate whether the stock trades cheaply or expensively relative to its fundamentals. Value investors use them to find mispricings—buying stocks that appear undervalued, with solid long-term prospects and limited downside risk.
9.20
Positive P/E while SLDP shows losses. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.22
P/S less than half of SLDP's 60.90. Joel Greenblatt would verify if margins support this discount.
0.86
Similar P/B to SLDP's 1.07. Philip Fisher would investigate if similar multiples reflect similar asset efficiency.
-11.20
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.
-11.25
Both companies show negative operating cash flow. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide operational issues.
0.86
Similar fair value ratio to SLDP's 1.07. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar valuations reflect similar quality.
2.72%
Positive earnings while SLDP shows losses. John Neff would investigate earnings advantage.
-8.93%
Both companies show negative FCF. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide capital intensity issues.