37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.34%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.94%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.34%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.68%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
29.83%
EBIT growth of 29.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
29.83%
Operating income growth of 29.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
30.97%
Net income growth of 30.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
30.77%
EPS growth of 30.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
30.77%
Diluted EPS growth of 30.77% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.12%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
8.88%
FCF growth of 8.88% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-24.51%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 14.86%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-24.51%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 11.18%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-24.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 4.57%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-28.50%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-28.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-28.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
40.85%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
40.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
40.85%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 40.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
197.43%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.48% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
197.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 5.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
197.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 8.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.71%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.90%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.97%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.06%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.