PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
64.48%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
64.48%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-40.28%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -4.93%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-40.28%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -6.80%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-41.24%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -8.33%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
11.11%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
11.11%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
59.62%
Share change of 59.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
59.62%
Diluted share change of 59.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.67%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-9.81%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
2.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Technology median of 17.22%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
2.24%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
2.24%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 7.72%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
41.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 41.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
41.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 41.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
41.87%
3Y OCF/share growth of 41.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
16.15%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
16.15%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper problems limiting mid-term profit potential.
16.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.33%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.99%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-43.91%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.34%
SG&A growth of 77.34% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.