PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.52%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-8.52%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.21%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-43.55%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-43.55%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-42.71%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-46.15%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-46.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.66%
OCF growth of 23.66% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
15.89%
FCF growth of 15.89% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-38.83%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 16.52%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-38.83%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.69%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-38.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.61%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
41.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 41.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
41.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 41.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
41.00%
3Y OCF/share growth of 41.00% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
37.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.54% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
37.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
37.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 6.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
168.44%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.35% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
168.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
168.44%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.35%
AR growth of 68.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.54%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-10.11%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.87%
SG&A growth of 22.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.