37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
68.85%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
68.85%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
47.67%
EBIT growth of 47.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
47.67%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
48.77%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
58.05%
EPS growth of 58.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
58.05%
Diluted EPS growth of 58.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
20.30%
Share change of 20.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
20.30%
Diluted share change of 20.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.75%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-85.21%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
12.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Technology median of 22.42%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
12.85%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 16.85%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
12.85%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 10.69%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
39.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
39.80%
OCF/share CAGR of 39.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
39.80%
3Y OCF/share growth of 39.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
57.22%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
57.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 20.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
57.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 16.43%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.72%
AR growth of 36.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.67%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-21.32%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.06%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.