37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
138.77%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
138.77%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
33.71%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
33.71%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
33.82%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
37.50%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
37.50%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
1.02%
Share change of 1.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.02%
Diluted share change of 1.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.49%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-56.42%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
122.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.81%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
122.27%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 12.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
49.81%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.84%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
11.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 11.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
11.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 11.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
26.36%
3Y OCF/share growth of 26.36% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
44.35%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.66% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
44.35%
Net income/share CAGR of 44.35% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
65.21%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.32%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 9.88%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.16%
AR growth of 38.16% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.13%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.94%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is -0.48%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.43%
SG&A growth of 34.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.