37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
71.44%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
71.44%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
81.69%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
81.69%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
85.42%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
85.00%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
85.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.02%
Share change of 0.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.02%
Diluted share change of 0.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.72%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
1.30%
FCF growth of 1.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
170.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.83%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
170.92%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
164.99%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
55.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 55.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
55.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 55.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
24.05%
3Y OCF/share growth of 24.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
86.32%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 34.18% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
86.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.96%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
83.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 15.51%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 11.39%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.43%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.64%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.57%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.08%
SG&A growth of 1.08% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.