37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
75.74%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
75.74%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
84.60%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
84.60%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
92.39%
Net income growth of 92.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
92.67%
EPS growth of 92.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
92.67%
Diluted EPS growth of 92.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.05%
Diluted share change of 0.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.97%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-5.27%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
164.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.73%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
78.13%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 22.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
134.21%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
71.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 71.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
76.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 76.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
52.55%
3Y OCF/share growth of 52.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
95.28%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 45.19% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
97.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
88.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 17.08%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.32%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 22.18%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-38.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 11.37%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.64%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.26%
Asset growth of 0.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.61%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.65%
SG&A growth of 17.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.