PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-29.14%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-29.14%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.51%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-219.42%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-219.42%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-250.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-264.24%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-264.24%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-207.29%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-2867.80%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
22.72%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Technology median of 27.57%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
62.56%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
71.50%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 14.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
79.85%
OCF/share CAGR of 79.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
84.32%
OCF/share CAGR of 84.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
79.50%
3Y OCF/share growth of 79.50% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
64.50%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm that management’s capital allocation strategy drives the outperformance.
39.99%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
33.05%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm expansions or margin boosts drive the short-term advantage.
125.93%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 13.82% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-73.38%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 21.88%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-61.93%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 14.06%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.66%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.91%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.28%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.93%
SG&A growth of 2.93% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.