PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-28.49%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-28.49%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.77%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-2289.71%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2289.71%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-1942.94%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-2322.73%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-2322.73%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-16.35%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-16.35%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.82%
OCF growth of 71.82% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-10.18%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
199.14%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.76%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
124.90%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
12.22%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 14.62%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
87.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 87.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
79.02%
OCF/share CAGR of 79.02% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
57.84%
3Y OCF/share growth of 57.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
42.79%
Net income/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger might see typical industry-level profit expansion over 10 years.
-100.88%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 14.52%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
31.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 13.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.43%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-42.76%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.80%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.96%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.16%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
7.07%
BV/share growth of 7.07% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.60%
R&D growth of 6.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.33%
SG&A growth of 5.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.