37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.29%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-24.29%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 1.72%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-157.31%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-157.31%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-180.66%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-149.11%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-149.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
8.96%
Share change of 8.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
8.96%
Diluted share change of 8.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.95%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-755.85%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
36.41%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 31.41%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent reinvestment or product expansions drive this gap.
122.98%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
13.42%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 11.76%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
59.47%
OCF/share CAGR of 59.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
31.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 31.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
43.20%
3Y OCF/share growth of 43.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
51.48%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.97% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
22.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 3.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
17.18%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 17.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
139.19%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 25.65% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-42.73%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 18.16%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-13.10%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 13.96%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.76%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.61%
Asset growth of 39.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
25.81%
BV/share growth of 25.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.16%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
10.18%
SG&A growth of 10.18% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.