PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.89%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
43.89%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
-23.97%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-23.97%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -1.97%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
15.21%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
14.29%
EPS growth of 14.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth of 14.29% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
6.71%
Share change of 6.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
6.71%
Diluted share change of 6.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-304.84%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
42.23%
FCF growth of 42.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
141.75%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.20%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
114.22%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-10.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.94%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
6.46%
OCF/share CAGR of 6.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-55.40%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-111.88%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
38.23%
Net income/share CAGR of 38.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
-44.37%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-351.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 14.80%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-4.62%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 10.78%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.19%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.12%
Asset growth of 86.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.04%
Positive BV/share change while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
236.20%
R&D growth of 236.20% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
8.62%
SG&A growth of 8.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.