PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.83%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-27.83%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-64.38%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-64.38%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-154.36%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-141.67%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-141.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.05%
Share change of 0.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.05%
Diluted share change of 0.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.76%
OCF growth of 10.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-15.94%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
152.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 9.83%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
47.29%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 6.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-17.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.74%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-18.51%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-3631.29%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-197.97%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-71.15%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-161.86%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-304.74%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.78%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-26.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 2.38%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.66%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.57%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-27.98%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
2.28%
Debt growth of 2.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
3.56%
R&D growth of 3.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
9.90%
SG&A growth of 9.90% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.