PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-64.21%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-64.21%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 6.09%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-3.04%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 9.69%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-3.04%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 10.18%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-2.13%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 10.41%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3.45%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 11.33%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3.45%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 11.11%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.26%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.26%
Diluted share change of 0.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.93%
OCF growth of 60.93% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
63.62%
FCF growth of 63.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-44.82%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Technology median is 15.29%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-38.59%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 9.68%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-69.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 2.97%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
40.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 40.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-2.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-198.65%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
1.39%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
-118.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 18.41%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-201.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.54%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-73.45%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 6.46%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-47.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 4.39%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.94%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-35.13%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 1.08%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
3.55%
Debt growth of 3.55% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-38.93%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-24.75%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.