PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
246.27%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
246.27%
Gross profit growth of 246.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-10.56%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.56%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -2.69%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
0.14%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.45%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
1.45%
Diluted share change of 1.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.07%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-93.10%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
120.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.79%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-1.01%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 22.96%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-16.75%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 11.44%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-30.60%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-47.60%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-357.24%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-87.16%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 46.52%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-236.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 55.21%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-3868.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 23.79%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.11%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 34.31%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-36.69%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 18.35%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.40%
AR growth of 66.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.56%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-39.10%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-13.37%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
122.22%
R&D growth of 122.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
58.42%
SG&A growth of 58.42% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.