37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-34.50%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.28%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-34.50%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 4.26%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-34.88%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-34.88%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.22%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-38.60%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-28.57%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-28.57%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
7.71%
Share change of 7.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
7.71%
Diluted share change of 7.71% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.58%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
0.05%
FCF growth of 0.05% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
93.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.95%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
-27.32%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 21.64%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-40.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 10.59%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-99.04%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-555.04%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-899.24%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-162.48%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Technology median of 23.40%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-215.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 32.53%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-718.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.21%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.79%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 7.68%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
54.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 7.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.39%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.74%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
128.73%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
0.65%
Debt growth of 0.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
13.25%
R&D growth of 13.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.24%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.