37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.46%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
-8.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is -2.15%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-13.46%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-13.46%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -2.61%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-7.12%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is -1.44%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
951.85%
EPS growth of 951.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
951.85%
Diluted EPS growth of 951.85% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-91.31%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-91.23%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
39027.63%
Dividend growth of 39027.63% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
7.91%
Positive OCF growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
131.76%
Positive FCF growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
7831.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.22%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
3255.83%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
3585.50%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 19.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
3871.23%
OCF/share CAGR of 3871.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
8286.40%
OCF/share CAGR of 8286.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
1778.52%
3Y OCF/share growth of 1778.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1935.90%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 16.60% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
64510.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.58%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
922.50%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
2718.80%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 38.23% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
4867.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 21.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
7288.57%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 18.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.55%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.19%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
1303.57%
BV/share growth of 1303.57% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-27.53%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.71%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.