37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 91.9K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.69%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.15%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
64.22%
Gross profit growth of 64.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-44.11%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-44.11%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-57.05%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-96.13%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-96.13%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1027.47%
Share change of 1027.47% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1017.46%
Diluted share change of 1017.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-91.13%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
22.58%
OCF growth of 22.58% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
80.83%
FCF growth of 80.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
462.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 28.92%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
246.30%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
766.40%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 15.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
227.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 227.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
912.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 912.04% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
260.84%
3Y OCF/share growth of 260.84% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
117.30%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
128.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 10.62%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
108.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 4.09%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
43.43%
Equity/share CAGR near Technology median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
438.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
308.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 14.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.21%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.41%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-91.27%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
16.32%
Debt growth of 16.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.67%
SG&A growth far above Technology median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.