37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
810.61%
Positive revenue growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
627.33%
Positive gross profit growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
2280.61%
Positive EBIT growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
2280.61%
Positive operating income growth while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
3929.03%
Positive net income growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
3919.61%
Positive EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
3919.61%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
0.07%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.07%
Diluted share change of 0.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
99.94%
Dividend growth of 99.94% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
2599.89%
OCF growth of 2599.89% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
12189.24%
FCF growth of 12189.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
4403.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.98%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
2002.34%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 21.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-45.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.61%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
4561.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 4561.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
2971.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 2971.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
14.92%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1642.47%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.81% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
1168.41%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 37.04%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-68.71%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 14.33%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
1836.87%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 40.21% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
2363.35%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-23.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 12.56%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
670.58%
Slight AR growth while Technology cuts AR. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is missing an opportunity to collect faster or if peers face sales declines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
781.79%
We expand assets while Technology is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
646.41%
BV/share growth of 646.41% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
997.12%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
232.02%
Our SG&A slightly up while Technology is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.