PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Strathcona Resources Ltd (SCR.TO)
38.000.60 (1.60%)
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.93%
Revenue growth 50-75% of Technology median of 1.58%. Guy Spier would worry if the firm is losing market share.
-0.38%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.19%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
0.52%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
0.52%
Operating income growth below 50% of Technology median of 2.65%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
-61.85%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-61.79%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-61.79%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.09%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-70.68%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-79.98%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
4236.51%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 29.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
2844.22%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 18.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
-50.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 12.68%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
35341.74%
OCF/share CAGR of 35341.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
1044.49%
OCF/share CAGR of 1044.49% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-62.22%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
520.19%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 27.03% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
260.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-77.37%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 3.80%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
2000.45%
Equity/share CAGR of 2000.45% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
3387.83%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 9.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
-25.86%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 8.01%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.62%
AR growth of 7.62% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
32.10%
Inventory growth of 32.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.96%
Asset growth of 0.96% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.98%
BV/share growth of 1.98% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.92%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.20%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.