PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
37.15 - 38.24
22.75 - 39.30
1.11M / 74.7K (Avg.)
12.71 | 2.99
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
68.85%
Positive growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages in a declining market.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.85%
Positive growth while Technology median is negative. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.24%
G&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
25.73%
Marketing expense change of 25.73% versus flat Technology spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-19.89%
Other expenses reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-11.30%
Operating expenses reduction while Technology median is -0.53%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-11.30%
Total costs reduction while Technology median is -2.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.89%
D&A reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
55.34%
EBITDA growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
73.55%
EBITDA margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
47.67%
Operating income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
69.01%
Operating margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
54.76%
Other expenses change of 54.76% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify control.
48.77%
Pre-tax income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
69.66%
Margin change of 69.66% versus flat Technology. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
54.76%
Tax expense growth while Technology reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
48.77%
Net income growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
69.66%
Net margin growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
58.05%
EPS growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
58.05%
Diluted EPS growth while Technology declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
20.30%
Share count change of 20.30% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
20.30%
Diluted share change of 20.30% versus stable Technology. Walter Schloss would verify approach.