1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
52.39%
Cash & equivalents growing 52.39% while ENPH's declined -25.43%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.04%
Below half of ENPH's -25.43%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-0.64%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 12.38%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.06%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's 65.76%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-80.83%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.85%
Below half of ENPH's -4.30%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.29%
Below half ENPH's 26.91%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-89.61%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-88.83%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-89.51%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-95.03%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.62%
1.1-1.25x ENPH's 37.68%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm invests in intangible or other non-core areas more aggressively.
-17.98%
Below half of ENPH's 28.93%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.28%
Below half of ENPH's 2.43%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.61%
Similar yoy growth to ENPH's 4.34%. Walter Schloss sees parallel payables strategy. Check top-line correlation.
-35.23%
Less than half of ENPH's 24.78%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-39.63%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
77.77%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 9.24%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
180.20%
Less than half of ENPH's -7.40%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
22.04%
1.1-1.25x ENPH's 18.78%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
48.60%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 12.13%. Michael Burry suspects significant leverage additions. Check coverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.97%
Less than half of ENPH's 42.07%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
22.20%
1.1-1.25x ENPH's 18.12%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is outpacing competitor in long-term leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.78%
Less than half of ENPH's 18.44%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-429.54%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -10.46%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
129.09%
Less than half of ENPH's -1040.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.36%
0.5-0.75x ENPH's -32.16%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
-5.28%
Below half ENPH's 2.43%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-95.03%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
18.12%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 13.68%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger debt expansions vs. competitor.
3.43%
Less than half of ENPH's 98.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
