1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
75.65%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth 0.75-0.9x ENPH's 94.27%. Bill Ackman might demand clarity on why growth lags the competitor's liquidity build.
655.23%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
89.20%
Similar yoy growth to ENPH's 94.27%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-27.31%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 1.15%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
4.77%
Inventory growth 50-75% of ENPH's 9.45%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
105.17%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
19.12%
Below half of ENPH's 47.57%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
3.83%
Below half ENPH's 21.39%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.93%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.53%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
2.04%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.51%
Less than half of ENPH's 20.25%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-15.52%
Below half of ENPH's 21.16%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.87%
Below half of ENPH's 40.84%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.07%
Less than half of ENPH's -13.53%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
3.07%
Less than half of ENPH's 28.30%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
466.33%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.21%
Below half of ENPH's 6726.24%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-47.19%
Less than half of ENPH's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-10.31%
Less than half of ENPH's 78.91%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
0.46%
Less than half of ENPH's -55.47%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.02%
Less than half of ENPH's 50.31%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
5.40%
Less than half of ENPH's -31.72%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.00%
Less than half of ENPH's 21.88%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.34%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -10.24%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-100.00%
Less than half of ENPH's 188.30%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
Below half ENPH's 112.33%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
3.87%
Below half ENPH's 40.84%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
2.04%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.76%
Less than half of ENPH's -44.23%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-46.54%
Less than half of ENPH's -17874.15%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
