1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-54.08%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-54.08% vs ENPH's -38.08%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
-86.57%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Short-Term Investments Growth.
-57.11%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x ENPH's -38.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
59.84%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's -24.33%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
15.80%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's 128.54%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
388.33%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.14%
0.75-0.9x ENPH's -10.35%. Bill Ackman would ask if competitor is building short-term resources more aggressively.
7.31%
Below half ENPH's 23.49%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
31.76%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
351.86%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
69.76%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.63%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
11.31%
Less than half of ENPH's 60.49%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
11.18%
Below half of ENPH's 30.84%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.87%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's -1.32%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
9.25%
Less than half of ENPH's 91.81%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-98.90%
Less than half of ENPH's 20.05%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-80.37%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.61%
Below half of ENPH's -29.16%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
0.77%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-16.77%
Less than half of ENPH's 14.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-11.18%
Less than half of ENPH's 95.30%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.46%
Less than half of ENPH's 140.59%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-2.90%
Less than half of ENPH's 96.52%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.68%
Less than half of ENPH's 37.90%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
18.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.55%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -7.83%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Similar yoy changes to ENPH's -100.00%. Walter Schloss finds parallel equity item fluctuations.
-2.15%
Below half ENPH's -86.26%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.87%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's -1.32%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
-0.63%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-28.87%
Less than half of ENPH's 130.80%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
23.43%
Less than half of ENPH's 105.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
