1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
21.22%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth below half of ENPH's 109.91%. Michael Burry would question if the firm faces a liquidity squeeze. Check for rising debts or negative cash flow.
3.26%
Higher Short-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
20.70%
Below half of ENPH's 109.91%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-45.25%
Receivables growth above 1.5x ENPH's -25.92%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-12.78%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's 20.67%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-75.24%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.52%
Below half of ENPH's 50.68%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.25%
Below half ENPH's 8.43%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-1.15%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-20.46%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-7.25%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.26%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.60%
Less than half of ENPH's -81.42%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-2.95%
Below half of ENPH's -13.45%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.89%
Below half of ENPH's 32.03%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-13.74%
Less than half of ENPH's 3.04%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
849.13%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 19.33%. Michael Burry sees a major discrepancy in short-term leverage. Check coverage and liquidity carefully.
-52.95%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-30.21%
Below half of ENPH's -96.29%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-15.06%
Less than half of ENPH's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-12.12%
50-75% of ENPH's -22.34%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
17.79%
Less than half of ENPH's -65.49%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.47%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
10.82%
Less than half of ENPH's -43.59%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
15.18%
Less than half of ENPH's -47.78%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.88%
Less than half of ENPH's -32.81%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.85%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-13.48%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's -11.50%. Bruce Berkowitz notes stronger reinvestment strategy.
-116.64%
Above 1.5x ENPH's -9.91%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.83%
Below half ENPH's 1440.96%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-0.89%
Below half ENPH's 32.03%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
3.26%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
20.41%
Less than half of ENPH's -60.66%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
19.78%
Less than half of ENPH's -2820.18%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
