1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-37.09%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-37.09% vs ENPH's -35.46%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.09%
Similar yoy growth to ENPH's -35.46%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-11.26%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 1.66%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
45.07%
Inventory growth 50-75% of ENPH's 60.94%. Bruce Berkowitz sees relatively tighter stock. Confirm sales aren't sacrificed.
14.27%
Other current assets growth < half of ENPH's -100.00%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-14.21%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -0.06%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
5.98%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 1.21%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.16%
Less than half of ENPH's -5.91%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
0.07%
Less than half of ENPH's -1.93%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
0.89%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.60%
Less than half of ENPH's 119.87%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
5.10%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 3.66%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
-100.00%
Higher Other Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-5.58%
Below half of ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
3.01%
Less than half of ENPH's 38.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-93.08%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.47%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.46%
Below half of ENPH's 29.52%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-50.93%
Exceeding 1.5x ENPH's -0.75%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-25.93%
Less than half of ENPH's 6.11%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
9.12%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.19%
Below half ENPH's 9.66%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
-100.00%
Higher Deferred Tax Liabilities (Non-Current) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.18%
Above 1.5x ENPH's -3.08%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
3.26%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 1.47%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
100.00%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-8.21%
Less than half of ENPH's 4.06%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.53%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.71%
Below half ENPH's -3.93%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-45.19%
Less than half of ENPH's -400.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.50%
Below half ENPH's -6.33%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-5.58%
Below half ENPH's 0.85%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
0.89%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
-13.00%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
51.89%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 35.46%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
