1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
89.81%
Cash & equivalents yoy growth at least 1.5x ENPH's 26.50%. Mohnish Pabrai might see this as a favorable liquidity edge, provided funds are well deployed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.81%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x ENPH's 26.50%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-2.29%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's -38.80%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
9.37%
Similar inventory growth to ENPH's 11.12%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
-12.42%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
23.34%
Below half of ENPH's -14.01%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
8.03%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 2.81%. David Dodd sees more aggressive capex. Confirm it's not overspending.
11.55%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.63%
Less than half of ENPH's 49.09%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
6.22%
Less than half of ENPH's 13.97%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
-30.29%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-100.00%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-2.36%
Less than half of ENPH's 16.36%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.56%
Below half of ENPH's 5.82%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.53%
Below half of ENPH's -9.53%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
15.90%
Less than half of ENPH's -21.82%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
2.52%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.95%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
35.25%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 2.11%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
18.80%
Exceeding 1.5x ENPH's 6.96%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
-9.67%
1.1-1.25x ENPH's -7.95%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
65.94%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.88%
Below half ENPH's 10.63%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.04%
Less than half of ENPH's -7.25%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
38.88%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 0.73%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.69%
Less than half of ENPH's -4.55%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.58%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -9.43%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
29.40%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 0.47%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.27%
Below half ENPH's -21.74%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
10.53%
Below half ENPH's -9.53%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-30.29%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
55.83%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
28.92%
Less than half of ENPH's -108.56%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
