1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-34.95%
Cash & equivalents declining -34.95% while ENPH's grows 192.51%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.95%
Below half of ENPH's 192.51%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
10.80%
Receivables growth 50-75% of ENPH's 21.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would note relatively tighter receivables. Check if sales remain robust.
-4.45%
Inventory growth above 1.5x ENPH's -0.49%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-6.78%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.06%
Below half of ENPH's 24.37%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
28.89%
Below half ENPH's -6.18%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
-100.00%
Higher Goodwill Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.04%
50-75% of ENPH's -9.88%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
-56.33%
Above 1.5x ENPH's -3.27%. Michael Burry sees potential overpaying or intangible bubble risk. Check synergy assumptions.
-97.95%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.02%
Less than half of ENPH's 10.07%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.09%
Below half of ENPH's -3.18%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.01%
Below half of ENPH's 15.68%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-0.54%
Less than half of ENPH's -13.45%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
44.44%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 9.61%. Michael Burry sees a major discrepancy in short-term leverage. Check coverage and liquidity carefully.
-32.22%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
246.29%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 1.68%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-60.46%
Less than half of ENPH's 0.52%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
4.80%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 1.12%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-7.20%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-99.90%
Below half ENPH's 7.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious gap in multi-year pipeline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.85%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 1.18%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
-6.59%
Less than half of ENPH's 45.45%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.42%
Less than half of ENPH's 18.67%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.49%
0.5-0.75x ENPH's -8.58%. Martin Whitman is wary of weaker retention or lower profitability.
-1.95%
Less than half of ENPH's -27.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.01%
Below half ENPH's -17.89%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.01%
Below half ENPH's 15.68%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-97.95%
Both ENPH and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
2.98%
Less than half of ENPH's 192.81%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
16.63%
Less than half of ENPH's 193.39%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
