1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-13.99%
Cash & equivalents declining -13.99% while ENPH's grows 98.67%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.99%
Below half of ENPH's 98.67%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
5.46%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's -7.80%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
3.93%
Inventory growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.38%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
13.83%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 4.29%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
0.44%
Below half of ENPH's 35.02%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
0.63%
Below half ENPH's -11.99%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.55%
Less than half of ENPH's 9838.84%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-30.55%
Less than half of ENPH's 1411.32%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
40.76%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.92%
Less than half of ENPH's -1.42%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.75%
Below half of ENPH's 84.80%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.83%
Below half of ENPH's 49.41%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
2.39%
Less than half of ENPH's 28.35%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
13.22%
Less than half of ENPH's 30.91%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
4.38%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.80%
Below half of ENPH's -8.41%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-2.12%
Less than half of ENPH's 131.02%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
3.30%
Less than half of ENPH's 17.68%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
10.00%
Less than half of ENPH's 161.95%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.94%
Less than half of ENPH's 0.49%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
6.40%
Less than half of ENPH's 39.87%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.14%
Less than half of ENPH's 29.64%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.02%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's -1.01%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-114.86%
Less than half of ENPH's 98.02%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.56%
Below half ENPH's 113.80%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.83%
Below half ENPH's 49.41%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
38.00%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
48.51%
Less than half of ENPH's 115.50%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
11.71%
Less than half of ENPH's 36.26%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
