1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-9.86%
Cash & equivalents declining -9.86% while ENPH's grows 163.76%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.86%
Below half of ENPH's 163.76%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
21.68%
Receivables growth 1.1-1.25x ENPH's 19.36%. Bill Ackman would demand reasons for extending more credit than the competitor.
4.84%
Inventory growth below half of ENPH's 54.91%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-87.65%
Other current assets growth < half of ENPH's 15.85%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-32.12%
Below half of ENPH's 79.01%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.29%
Below half ENPH's 20.24%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.74%
Less than half of ENPH's -3.46%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
7.74%
Less than half of ENPH's -2.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
61.55%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.25%
Less than half of ENPH's 9.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
13.44%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 6.35%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.98%
Below half of ENPH's 50.83%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
14.64%
50-75% of ENPH's 25.72%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
41.43%
Above 1.5x ENPH's 1.94%. Michael Burry sees a major discrepancy in short-term leverage. Check coverage and liquidity carefully.
9.87%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.49%
Less than half of ENPH's 260.63%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-40.70%
Less than half of ENPH's 11.55%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
3.51%
Less than half of ENPH's 52.72%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.70%
Less than half of ENPH's 18.02%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
2.88%
Less than half of ENPH's 25.09%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.52%
Less than half of ENPH's 19.38%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.70%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.74%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 3.09%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
4.10%
Less than half of ENPH's -37.56%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.66%
Below half ENPH's 730.30%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-15.98%
Below half ENPH's 50.83%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
61.55%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
6.34%
Less than half of ENPH's 50.51%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
10.17%
Less than half of ENPH's -962.56%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.
