1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-28.32%
Cash & equivalents declining -28.32% while ENPH's grows 2.66%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.32%
Below half of ENPH's 2.66%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-12.53%
Receivables growth less than half of ENPH's 48.84%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
18.21%
Inventory growth above 1.5x ENPH's 11.27%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
6.45%
1.1-1.25x ENPH's 5.34%. Bill Ackman might question if the company is accumulating more extraneous short-term items.
-8.24%
Below half of ENPH's 9.74%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.61%
Below half ENPH's 22.13%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.04%
Less than half of ENPH's 7.34%. David Dodd sees relatively fewer intangible expansions. Possibly more tangible-driven.
-35.04%
Less than half of ENPH's 3.81%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
82.70%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.43%
Less than half of ENPH's 5.53%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
45.61%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 10.30%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.60%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 9.87%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a stronger asset build. Check if it's producing returns.
2.20%
Less than half of ENPH's 50.80%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-58.49%
Less than half of ENPH's 214.43%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
2.58%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating worse performance.
31.03%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 14.20%. David Dodd sees stronger subscription/prepayment demand.
-8.89%
Less than half of ENPH's 43.97%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-29.77%
Less than half of ENPH's 108.19%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-2.37%
Less than half of ENPH's -98.09%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.74%
Less than half of ENPH's 9.05%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
1.17%
Less than half of ENPH's -56.61%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.86%
Less than half of ENPH's 5.91%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.50%
Below half ENPH's 58.78%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
9.03%
Less than half of ENPH's 221.91%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4024.33%
≥ 1.5x ENPH's 16.29%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
13.60%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's 9.87%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions are well-justified by ROI.
82.70%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to ENPH's zero value, indicating better performance.
-26.60%
Above 1.5x ENPH's -9.19%. Michael Burry sees a major jump. Investigate leverage rationale.
-25.69%
1.25-1.5x ENPH's -17.18%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.
