1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-1.02%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-1.02% vs MAXN's -43.59%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.02%
Below half of MAXN's -43.59%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-46.16%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x MAXN's -32.55%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
-4.56%
Inventory growth below half of MAXN's -73.09%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-4.66%
Other current assets growth < half of MAXN's 3886.20%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-7.02%
Below half of MAXN's 1.49%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
1.19%
Below half MAXN's -35.50%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.70%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating better performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.40%
Less than half of MAXN's -78.00%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.75%
Below half of MAXN's -38.49%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.86%
Below half of MAXN's -14.75%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-5.72%
Less than half of MAXN's -46.16%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-6.85%
Less than half of MAXN's -84.57%. David Dodd sees much smaller short-term leverage burden vs. competitor.
-6.83%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-30.33%
Below half of MAXN's 133.38%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
5.00%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-9.36%
Less than half of MAXN's 42.78%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
7.71%
Less than half of MAXN's -4.63%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.09%
Less than half of MAXN's -66.85%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
4.28%
Less than half of MAXN's -20.46%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.97%
Less than half of MAXN's 2.71%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
1.64%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.07%
Below half MAXN's -8.12%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
12.71%
Less than half of MAXN's -49.45%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.61%
Below half MAXN's -39.22%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-1.86%
Below half MAXN's -14.75%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
4.70%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to MAXN's zero value, indicating better performance.
0.36%
Less than half of MAXN's -2.20%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
4.47%
Similar yoy changes to MAXN's 5.73%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net leverage strategies.
